Anyway, Woodard and Coster, along with Isaac, were definitely worth the price of admission. Was this my favorite Hamlet ever? No, probably not. But it was interesting, for the most part, with some eye-rolling directorial nonsense thrown in. I was mainly engaged for the nearly four-hour playing time. On the whole, they told the story well, which is my number one ask of a play, especially Shakespeare. Well, one scene was confusing as heck in the storytelling aspect due to some directorial nonsense, but because I know the play pretty darn well, I worked my way through it. For someone going to their first Hamlet, I wonder if they ever figured out what was going on...
photo credit: Carol Rosegg |
photo credit: Sara Krulwich |
Speaking of Polonius' dead body, here come some staging spoilers: the putting of his body in a theater seat was at the end of the second 'act', then the third 'act' started with his body positioned center stage. During Ophelia's mad scene, she continually brought in planters and dropped the dirt over her father's body. Um. And then she came out with a garden hose and proceeded to 'drown' by pouring water all over herself and her dirty father. There was mud everywhere and she laid down next to him. Then there were a few scenes done around them, as if they weren't there, which was awkward, then there was a blackout and when the lights came back up, Polonius and Ophelia sat up and proceeded to play the First and Second Gravedigger. Ok. So, I think the point for all of that was to get the shock value of their sitting up together to do those scenes, so it seemed as if it were staged backward. Or something. I didn't much appreciate that particular directorial choice.
photo credit: Carol Rosegg |
The rest of the cast was quite good as well - it took me a bit to get used to only nine actors playing all the roles, and I've already shared my quibbles with some of the doubling, so I won't dwell. I found it interesting that the gal playing Ophelia had the same blunt, flat affect that Laura had in the recent Glass Menagerie revival (both shows directed by the same director, btw). Where I found that affect to be very revealing in Menagerie, here I found it too false, jarring and contemporary. So that character didn't work for me, unfortunately.
Another production aspect that DID work for me, though, was the music - there was an onstage musician, playing the cello and some kind of small pipe organ. I did like the underscoring - I thought it was very effective and didn't intrude or force mood, just heightened things. The lighting and sound choices were also very good - at first, I thought playing the first few scenes with the ghost in the dark was a silly idea, but with the terrific lighting and even more terrific acting from Coster as the lights dimly showed him as the ghost, I came on board with the concept.
All in all, I enjoyed myself at this production of Hamlet, quibbles and all, because Oscar Isaac, Charlayne Woodard and Ritchie Coster were fantastic and overrode the aspects I didn't enjoy as much. I'm glad I saw it and I look forward to seeing all of them, maybe especially the talented and charming Isaac, on stage again soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment